Back to feed
SoccerSport | The GuardianBilly Munday

New faces, gulfs in class and flawed drama: how 48 teams changed the World Cup

New faces, gulfs in class and flawed drama: how 48 teams changed the World Cup

At a glance

The first 48-team World Cup had its positives and negatives – do we need to brace for a 64-team future? It was less than 12 months after Gianni Infantino succeeded Sepp Blatter as president that Fifa announced the expansion of the men’s World Cup from 32 to 48 teams. The reaction was mixed. Diego Maradona said he was “

Primary source
— Read original article
Published
Topic
Soccer

The first 48-team World Cup had its positives and negatives – do we need to brace for a 64-team future?

It was less than 12 months after Gianni Infantino succeeded Sepp Blatter as president that Fifa announced the expansion of the men’s World Cup from 32 to 48 teams. The reaction was mixed.

Diego Maradona said he was “delighted by Gianni’s initiative” because it allowed each country to dream of reaching the tournament, renewing their passion for football.

Joachim Löw, then in charge of the world champions Germany, said: “I don’t think it’s a good idea to dilute the sporting value …

In the long term, the quality suffers.” On the evidence of the first 48-team edition, won by Spain after 104 games across five-and-a-half weeks in North America, it’s fair to conclude Maradona and Löw both had a point. Continue reading...

This summary comes from Sport | The Guardian. Read the full article at the original source.

Read original article — Sport | The Guardian

References

More in Soccer